Bank Fraud · Trial Preparation
Which Post-Trial Motions and Financial Findings Matter After a Bank Fraud Verdict?
A bank-fraud verdict leaves questions for the judge, and some deadlines arrive well before sentencing. Review the trial record and check each proposed financial finding.
Eligible to Practice in Texas
Attorney at Law
Bar Card Number: 00796807
TX License Date: 11/01/1996
214 Connally St Ste A
Sulphur Spgs, TX 75482-2612
Explore the Federal Bank Fraud Knowledge Hub
The first job after a guilty verdict is to check the calendar. A sentencing date several months away does not extend the time for a post-trial motion. Counsel should identify the rule, the event that starts its deadline and the relief being requested. At the same time, the defense needs the trial record: exhibits, testimony, rulings, objections and the final instructions. Those materials show which issues can be raised and what evidence supports them.
Which motion fits the trial record?
Rule 29 remains relevant after the jury has returned a guilty verdict. A Rule 29 motion, due within 14 days after the verdict or the jury’s discharge, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. A lawyer preparing that motion might focus on a single element of one count, even though the trial involved many transactions. The transcript matters more than a recollection of how a witness sounded. Any earlier Rule 29 filing and the judge’s response will also need attention.
Rule 33 addresses a different request: a new trial. The grounds may be an error at trial or newly discovered evidence. The legal test and filing period depend on the basis of the motion: 3 years after the verdict for newly discovered evidence and 14 days for other grounds. A document discovered after the verdict is not automatically enough. Counsel must assess when it became available, what it establishes and whether the governing requirements are met.
There is a practical reason to order the transcript promptly. The lawyer drafting a motion has to cite what happened in court, including the grounds stated for an objection and the judge’s ruling. The record may also contain an offer of proof explaining evidence the jury never heard. For an instruction issue, the defense request and final charge should be read together with the objection. An appellate argument can depend on those few lines of the transcript.
What belongs in the loss calculation?
The government’s calculation may leave out a payment. Alternatively, the defense may have credited proceeds from a collateral sale without addressing a restriction in the guideline. Either problem can change the dispute at sentencing. Counsel should go back to the transaction records and explain why the proposed treatment is legally correct. Simply subtracting every recovery from the original loan amount may not answer the guideline question.
A defense calculation should be reproducible. A reader should be able to find the advance on the bank statement, the payments in the ledger and the collateral proceeds in the sale records. Next to each disputed entry, counsel can explain the treatment the defense seeks under § 2B1.1 or the relevant-conduct rules. Counsel also needs to establish which edition of the Guidelines Manual applies. If the presentence report takes another approach, the objection should identify the disagreement for a ruling.
Restitution, forfeiture and the appeal deadline
Hypothetical: the bank charged off $310,000 in June 2024 and assigned the loan to a debt buyer in January 2025. The charge-off is an accounting entry. It cannot, by itself, tell the court how much restitution to order or which property is forfeitable.
| Question | What to check |
|---|---|
| Who receives restitution? | Whether the loan has been assigned or someone has paid under a guarantee or insurance policy. |
| How much? | Those facts, checked against the restitution statute and the evidence of loss. |
| Overlapping claims | Resolve an apparent overlap between claims before the figures are adopted. |
For forfeiture, identify the statute invoked and the property or proceeds the government seeks. A third party may claim an interest in an asset. Counsel needs to consider the Rule 32.2(c) procedure for that claim separately from the defendant’s objections. The judgment should make clear what the court has ordered.
An appeal has its own filing rules. Some timely post-trial motions affect the notice-of-appeal period, but counsel must determine whether the particular motion qualifies. Waiting for sentencing to raise a post-trial issue, or assuming that every pending filing suspends a deadline, can create a serious problem. Any relevant waiver belongs in that review too. Meanwhile, the client needs an explanation of what remains undecided. A verdict, an estimated guideline range and the sentence eventually imposed are not interchangeable.
Primary legal sources
| Source | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure | Rule 29 (acquittal), Rule 32.2 (forfeiture) and Rule 33 (new trial). |
| U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual | § 2B1.1 loss rules; use the edition applicable to sentencing. |
| 18 U.S.C. § 3663A | Mandatory restitution in covered cases. |
| 18 U.S.C. § 982 | Criminal forfeiture provisions. |
To discuss representation, contact Heath Hyde or call 903-439-0000. Representation begins only if the firm agrees to take the matter.
